Lazarus Home
Information Superhighway Accessibility Vannevar Bush Community Chat Vote


 

1. Introduction
2. End Users
3. Communication
4. Time and Money

5. Structure

6. Ethics
7. Continuing Effort
8. Summary
9. Other Resources
10. Works Cited



PDF Paper

Structure  

  The Information Design of Community-Building

The backbone of the information design of a community-building web site should be a sound ownership (if not commercially owned) and governance model. To promote democracy online, Rheingold (2000) suggests that a community's social charter be written before going online (339). "You need to specify the qualifications for voting membership, the mechanisms for campaigning and voting, the structure and power of a governing body, and mechanisms for recalling or impeaching that ruling body" (339). Hashing these things out online works poorly because the medium does not support consensus decision-making well (339). A computer conference is a good place for all opinions to be heard before decisions are made, however (339). Online governance structures may not be needed until trouble arises, but it is efficient to anticipate that trouble will arise. For commercial communities, ownership issues can be particularly difficult. Rheingold (2000) found it was a mistake to accept venture capital financing for his first Internet start-up, a magazine/virtual community called Electric Minds, in 1996-97 (337-338). He speculates that venture capital is not a healthy way to grow a social enterprise, because venture capitalists want return on investment too quickly and a community cannot get off the ground and grow sustainably that quickly (336-337).

Follow Trail: Ethics >