Subject: Intellectual Property Rights & NII Below is the Executive Summary of the National Information Infrastructure Task Force draft report on intellectual property rights. The complete report will be available on the IITF Bulletin Board, accessible through the Internet by pointing the Gopher Client to iitf.doc.gov or by telnet to iitf.doc.gov (log in as gopher). For a paper copy, call (703) 305-9300 or write NII, USPTO, Box 4, Washington, D.C. 20231- 0001. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND THE NATIONAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE A PRELIMINARY DRAFT OF THE REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Executive Summary INTRODUCTION The Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, chaired by Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks Bruce A. Lehman, was established as part of the White House Information Infrastructure Task Force. The Task Force, chaired by Secretary of Commerce Ronald H. Brown, was created to articulate and implement the Administration's vision for the National Information Infrastructure (NII). The Task Force is working with the private sector, public interest groups, Congress and State and local governments to develop comprehensive telecommunications and information policies and programs that best meet the country's needs. The Preliminary Draft of the Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights represents the Working Group's examination and analysis to date of the intellectual property implications of the NII. While it addresses each of the major areas of intellectual property law, it focuses primarily on copyright law and its application and effectiveness in the context of the NII. The Working Group is issuing the Preliminary Draft to solicit public comment prior to issuing a Final Report. The Working Group will also hold public hearings on the Draft. BACKGROUND The NII has great potential to increase access to information and entertainment resources that will be delivered quickly and economically anywhere in the country in the blink of an eye. For instance, hundreds of channels of "television" programming, thousands of musical recordings, and literally millions of "magazines" and "books" can be made available to homes and businesses across the United States and, eventually, the world. It can improve the nation's education and health care systems. It can enhance the ability of U.S. firms to compete and succeed in the global economy, generating more jobs for Americans. New job opportunities can also be created in the processing, organizing, packaging and dissemination of the information and entertainment products flowing through the NII. The NII is much more than computers, telephones, fax machines, scanners, cameras, keyboards, televisions, monitors, printers, switches, routers, wires, cables, networks and satellites. What will drive the success of the NII is the _content_ moving through it. Therefore, the potential of the NII will not be realized if the content is not protected effectively. Owners of intellectual property rights will not be willing to put their interests at risk if appropriate systems -- both in the U.S. and internationally -- are not in place to permit them to set and enforce the terms and conditions under which their works are made available in the NII environment. Likewise, the public will not use the services available on the NII and generate the market necessary for its success unless access to a wide variety of works is provided under equitable and reasonable terms and conditions, and the integrity of those works is assured. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. LAW The Draft Report analyzes current copyright law and its application in the NII environment. The Working Group concludes that, with the following limited amendments and clarifications, the Copyright Act will provide the necessary protection of rights in copyrighted works -- and appropriate limitations on those rights. 1. DISTRIBUTION BY TRANSMISSION a. THE DISTRIBUTION RIGHT The Copyright Act gives a copyright owner the exclusive right "to distribute _copies or phonorecords_ of the copyrighted work" to the public. A copy or phonorecord is a material object in which a copyrighted work is fixed, such as a compact disc, a videocassette or a paperback book. It is not clear that a transmission can constitute a distribution of copies of the work under the current law. Yet, in the world of high-speed, communications systems, it is possible to transmit a copy of a work from one location to another. This may be the case, for instance, when a computer program is transmitted from one computer to ten other computers. When the transmission is complete, the original copy remains in the transmitting computer and a copy resides in the memory of, or in a storage device associated with, each of the other computers. Therefore, this transmission results essentially in the distribution of ten copies of the work. The Working Group recommends that Section 106 of the Copyright Act be amended to reflect the fact that copies of works can be distributed to the public by transmission, and that such transmissions fall within the exclusive distribution right of the copyright owner. The Working Group also recommends that the definition of "transmit" in Section 101 of the Copyright Act be amended to delineate between those transmissions that are communications of performances or displays and those that are distributions of reproductions. When a transmission may constitute both a communication of a performance or display and a distribution of a reproduction (such as when a phonorecord of a sound recording is distributed and the recipient may listen to it while it is being downloaded), the Working Group recommends that such a transmission be considered a distribution of a reproduction if the _primary purpose or effect_ of the transmission is to distribute a _copy or phonorecord_ of the work to the recipient of the transmission. The Working Group also recommends that the prohibitions on importation be amended to reflect the fact that copies or phonorecords of copyrighted works can be imported into the United States by transmission. Although the Working Group recognizes that the U.S. Customs Service cannot, for all practical purposes, enforce a prohibition on importation by transmission, given the global dimensions of the information infrastructure of the future, it is important that copyright owners have the other remedies for infringements of this type available to them. b. PUBLICATION The legislative history to the Copyright Act makes clear that any form of dissemination of a work in which a _material object_ does not change hands is not a "publication" of the work, no matter how many people are exposed to it. Thus, a transmission of a performance or display via the NII would not constitute publication, since a material object does not change hands. However, in the case of a transmission of a reproduction, the recipient of the transmission ends up with a copy of the work. Therefore, the Working Group recommends that the definition of "publication" in Section 101 of the Copyright Act be amended to include the concept of distribution by transmission. C. FIRST SALE DOCTRINE The first sale doctrine allows the owner of a particular, lawfully-made copy of a work to dispose of it in any manner, with certain exceptions, without infringing the copyright owner's exclusive right of distribution. In the case of transmissions, a copy of the work remains with the first owner (and the recipient of the transmission receives a reproduction of the work); the owner does not dispose of his or her copy. Therefore, the Working Group recommends that Section 109 of the Copyright Act be amended to make clear that the first sale doctrine does not apply to transmissions. 2. TECHNOLOGICAL PROTECTION The ease of infringement and the difficulty of detection and enforcement will cause copyright owners to look to technology, as well as the law, for protection of their works. Technology can be used to help protect copyrighted works against unauthorized access, reproduction, manipulation, distribution, performance or display. It can also be useful in the authentication of the integrity of copyrighted works and in the management and licensing of the rights in such works. However, it is clear that technology can also be used to defeat any protection that technology provides. Therefore, the Working Group recommends that the Copyright Act be amended to prohibit the importation, manufacture and distribution of devices (or any component or circuitry incorporated into any device or product), or the offering or performance of any service, the primary purpose or effect of which is to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or otherwise circumvent, without authority of the copyright owner or the law, any process, treatment, mechanism or system which prevents or inhibits the exercise of any of the exclusive rights under Section 106. The Working Group also recommends other related amendments to provide civil causes of action and remedies for violations of the proposed prohibition. 3. COPYRIGHT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION In the future, the copyright management information associated with a work -- such as the name of the copyright owner, and the terms and conditions for uses of the work -- may be critical to the efficient operation and success of the NII. The public should be protected from fraud in the creation or alteration of such information. Therefore, the Working Group recommends that Section 506 of the Copyright Act be amended to prohibit fraudulent copyright management information and fraudulent removal or alteration of copyright management information. 4. PUBLIC PERFORMANCE RIGHT Sound recordings are the only copyrighted works that are capable of being performed that are not granted a public performance right. The Working Group believes that it is time to rectify this inequity. The Working Group notes that the Administration supports two bills introduced in Congress that would grant a limited performance right to sound recordings. The bills, H.R. 2576 and S. 1421, would add to the exclusive rights of a copyright owner in a sound recording the right to perform or authorize the performance of the sound recording by "digital transmission." The right granted in the bill is not the full performance right granted to other copyrighted works. For instance, the legislation would not change the law with respect to live public performances. It would also not touch analog transmissions -- the transmissions currently received over the radio. It would only grant a right with respect to transmissions in a digital format -- those that pose the greatest threat to the copyright owners of sound recordings. 5. FAIR USE The Working Group has significant concerns regarding the ability of the limitations on copyright owners' exclusive rights -- particularly those limitations found in Sections 107 (fair use), 108 (library exemptions) and 110 (1) and (2) (educational uses) -- to provide the public with adequate access to copyrighted works transmitted via the NII. As more and more works are available primarily or exclusively on-line, it is critical that researchers, students and other members of the public have opportunities _on-line_ equivalent to their current opportunities _off-line_ to browse through copyrighted works in their school and public library. Public libraries and schools historically have been safeguards against the United States becoming a nation of information "haves" and "have nots." We must ensure that they continue to be able to assume that role. Guidelines for library and educational use of printed matter and music were voluntarily adopted by diverse parties and set out in the House and Conference reports accompanying the 1976 revisions to the Copyright Act. While the principles should still be applicable, it is difficult and, perhaps, inappropriate, to apply the specific language of some of those guidelines in the context of digital works and on-line services. Therefore, the Working Group will sponsor a conference this summer to bring together copyright owner and user interests to develop guidelines for fair uses of copyrighted works by and in public libraries and schools. While participation in the conference will be by invitation, the public may attend. 6. LICENSING With limited exceptions, intellectual property law leaves the licensing of rights to the marketplace. In certain circumstances, particularly where transaction costs are believed to dwarf per-transaction royalties, Congress has found it necessary to provide for compulsory licenses. The Working Group finds that under current conditions, additional compulsory licensing of intellectual property rights is neither necessary nor desirable. The marketplace should be allowed to develop whatever licensing systems may be appropriate for the NII. 7. INTERNATIONAL There must be adequate and effective protection for entertainment and information products delivered via the global information infrastructure (GII). This protection should be granted on the basis of national treatment -- without regard to the origin of the transmission or the nationality of the author. An appropriate intellectual property rights regime to protect the content transmitted over the GII is an essential condition precedent if the full benefits of the GII are to be enjoyed. To attain the needed level of protection internationally, we must also find ways to span the differences between the continental _droit d'auteur_ and neighboring rights systems and the Anglo-American copyright systems. An essential element of this effort will be to harmonize levels of protection. B. TECHNOLOGY Interoperability and interconnectivity of networks, systems, services and products operating within the NII will enhance its development and success. Standardization of copyright management (standardized header information and format, for instance) as well as technological protection methods (such as encryption) may also be useful. However, intellectual property rights should not be diminished in the standard-setting process, unless agreed to by the owners of such rights. C. EDUCATION Effective education of the public about intellectual property rights is crucial to the successful development of the NII. Therefore, the principles of intellectual property law must be taught in our schools and libraries. Educational efforts to increase the public's awareness of their own intellectual property rights, as well as those of others, will increase respect for those rights. Clearer guidelines with respect to the exclusive rights of copyright and other intellectual property rights holders, as well as the limitations on those rights, will make compliance with the law easier. Following its conference on fair use, the Working Group will sponsor a second conference on intellectual property education. The purpose of that conference will be to develop curricula that may be used in schools and libraries. Additional means of education, particularly those that use the NII itself, will also be explored and developed. Participation in the conference will be by invitation, but all proceedings will be open to the public. *** The Working Group is soliciting public comment on the Preliminary Draft. The public may submit written comments to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks on or before September 7, 1994. Reply comments may be submitted until September 28, 1994. Comments may also be submitted electronically to an Internet address. The Working Group expects to hold public hearings on the Preliminary Draft in Washington, D.C., Chicago and Los Angeles. The details of these hearings will be announced at a later date. The Working Group will also hold conferences in Washington, D.C., on library and educational uses of copyrighted works and on intellectual property education. Participation in the conferences will be by invitation only, but the proceedings will be open to the public.